It\'s often said that evolution is science and creationism is religion.
Howell addresses the threat that Darwinism poses not only to traditional Christian re.
Howell also spends a chapter on logic and exposes invalid inferences and logical fallacies consistently employed by evolutionists.
In an Epilogue, Dr.
Using their own arguments, Howell reveals how Darwinists have created a false narrative supported only by conceptual facts and coherent truths, a narrative inconsistent with objective reality.
He also explains the differences between conceptual facts and empirical facts and the differences between coherent truth and objective truth.
Howell provides numerous examples of Darwinists conflating these two modes of science in order to make the theory of evolution appear more robust than it actually is.
When doing so, scientists must recognize the differences between empirical science and historical science.
However, both evolution and divine creation can be studied scientifically as hypotheses for human origins.
evolution is no more a science than creationism is.
Howell explains why Darwinism is a worldview and evolution its creation myth, just as divine creation is the creation myth for the Judeo-Christian worldview.
By crafting a new creation myth for the atheist\'s worldview, Darwin filled the proverbial vacuum that Nature so abhors, an accomplishment perhaps even bigger than just discovering the origin of biological species.
Dr.
If God didn\'t create, where did the universe come from? How did life on Earth get started? Darwin and his colleagues supplied the answer, but it was nothing less than a full-scale attack on the Judeo-Christian establishment of the Western world.
Prior to evolution, atheists could reject God and the traditional creation story, but they had no replacement.
All religions have a creation myth, but until the theory of evolution came along, atheists had no origins story of their own.
Creationism is not religion and biological evolution is not science.
What then are they? They are both myths in the literal and historical sense of the word: a creation story generally accepted as true by its adherents and which encapsulates the worldview and deepest values of those who believe.
Daniel Howell asserts that neither contention is true.
In Sometimes Deceived, Liberty University professor Dr.
Although this opinion is widely held by the public - including many religious people - it represents a misunderstanding of both creationism and evolution.
It\'s often said that evolution is science and creationism is religion
