We think that we know the first three chapters of the Bible well - Creation and the Fall, we say, knowingly.
Fesko is Academic Dean and Professor of Systematic and Historical Theology at Westminster Seminary in California..
V.
About the Author: J.
If you are tangled up on origins in Genesis then this may be your way through the maze.
More specifically, one must interpret Genesis 1-3 in the light of Christ and Eschatology.\' By doing this, John is able to explain this important portion of scripture from a holistic Christological viewpoint, one that is consistent throughout scripture.
The way through the impasse is to interpret Genesis in the manner presented in the New Testament.
Is there a better way to approach the opening chapters of Genesis in spite of the debate? The answer to that question is an unqualified, \'Yes\'...
Over the controversies that surround these first three chapters he says \'there are many theologians who represent different schools of thought.
John Fesko says that it does and that without seeing Christ and the end days, we cannot understand the first days.
But have we ever stopped to consider that Jesus in the book of Revelation is called \'the Last Adam\' and the \'Alpha & Omega\'? Should this make a difference to how we look at the first three chapters of Genesis? Dr.
We think that we know the first three chapters of the Bible well - Creation and the Fall, we say, knowingly
