Descriere YEO:
Pe YEO găsești Logics of History | William de la The University of Chicago Press, în categoria Carte straina.
Indiferent de nevoile tale, Logics of History | William H. Sewell din categoria Carte straina îți poate aduce un echilibru perfect între calitate și preț, cu avantaje practice și moderne.
Caracteristici și Avantaje ale produsului Logics of History | William
- Departament: gaming-carti-birotica
- Ideal pentru pasionații de jocuri, birotică și distracție online.
Preț: 334 Lei
Caracteristicile produsului Logics of History | William
- Brand: The University of Chicago Press
- Categoria: Carte straina
- Magazin: carturesti.ro
- Ultima actualizare: 03-05-2025 02:21:46
Comandă Logics of History | William Online, Simplu și Rapid
Prin intermediul platformei YEO, poți comanda Logics of History | William de la carturesti.ro rapid și în siguranță. Bucură-te de o experiență de cumpărături online optimizată și descoperă cele mai bune oferte actualizate constant.
Descriere magazin:
While social scientists and historians have been exchanging ideas for a long time, they have never developed a proper dialogue about social theory.
William H.
Sewell Jr. observes that on questions of theory the communication has been mostly one way: from social science to history.
Logics of
History argues that both history and the social sciences have something crucial to offer each other. While historians do not think of themselves as theorists, they know something social scientists do not: how to think about the temporalities of social life. On the other hand, while social scientists\' treatments of temporality are usually clumsy, their theoretical sophistication and penchant for structural accounts of social life could offer much to historians.Renowned for his work at the crossroads of history, sociology, political science, and anthropology,
Sewell argues that only by combining a more sophisticated understanding of historical time with a concern for larger theoretical questions can a satisfying social theory emerge. In
Logics of
History, he reveals the shape such an engagement could take, some of the topics it could illuminate, and how it might affect both sides of the disciplinary divide.