Many volumes have addressed the question of whether or not Naturalism is a required part of Scientific methodology.
If Methodological Naturalism is rejected, what replaces it? If science is not naturalistic, what defines science? If Naturalism is rejected, what is gained and what is lost? How does the practice of science change? What new avenues would be available, and how would they be i.
However, few, if any, go any further into the many concerns that arise from a rejection of naturalism.
Many volumes have addressed the question of whether or not Naturalism is a required part of Scientific methodology