When is political Compromise acceptable--and when is it fundamentally rotten, something we should never accept, come what may? What if a Rotten Compromise is politically necessary? Compromise is a great political virtue, especially for the sake of peace.
But just what are those limits? At what point does peace secured with Compromise become unjust? Focusing attention on vitally important questi.
But, as Avishai Margalit argues, there are moral limits to acceptable Compromise even for peace.
When is political Compromise acceptable--and when is it fundamentally rotten, something we should never accept, come what may? What if a Rotten Compromise is politically necessary? Compromise is a great political virtue, especially for the sake of peace