Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn 2022 |

Descriere YEO:

Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn - Disponibil la carturesti.ro

Pe YEO găsești Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn de la Radical Philosophy, în categoria Reviste.

Indiferent de nevoile tale, Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn 2022 | din categoria Reviste îți poate aduce un echilibru perfect între calitate și preț, cu avantaje practice și moderne.

Preț: 63 Lei

Caracteristicile produsului Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn

• Brand: Radical Philosophy
• Categoria: Reviste
• Magazin: carturesti.ro
• Ultima actualizare: 11-11-2024 01:46:56

Comandă Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn Online, Simplu și Rapid

Prin intermediul platformei YEO, poți comanda Radical Philosophy 2.13 / Autumn de la carturesti.ro rapid și în siguranță. Bucură-te de o experiență de cumpărături online optimizată și descoperă cele mai bune oferte actualizate constant.

Descriere magazin:
It’s 50 years since the first issue of Radical Philosophy was published in 1972. To mark the occasion, we asked a selection of former editors to share their recollections and reflections on their time on the job. We wanted to hear from those involved in the early years, without neglecting those who had participated in subsequent developments. There are memoirs by Jonathan Ree, Sean Sayers, Christopher J. Arthur, Kate Soper and Diana Coole, and an interview with Stella Sandford, by Victoria Browne. There is also an extended interview in this issue with Peter Osborne, the journal’s longest-serving editor, by David Cunningham. (A further interview with Mark Neocleous will appear in RP 214.) They all offer important contributions to a history of RP, with valuable insights into the experiences that founded and sustained it, the ambitions and challenges, the continuities and breaks, not ignoring the crucial, often glamourless and comical practicalities of its production and distribution. Readers will find testimony to the generational solidarity underpinning RP’s exceptional endurance, but they will also discover some of the conflicts and disappointments that are perhaps belied by the image of a half-century old journal. RP has survived because of the extraordinary commitments of its editors, and sometimes despite them.The selection of perspectives here is obviously partial and inadequate to a comprehensive retrospective. In preparing for this anniversary, some of us trawled through past issues to produce a complete list of editors: we counted 83. And that doesn’t include the dedicated writers who have helped in no small measure to make the journal what it is. The editors we ended up inviting have been gracious enough to expose the personal character of their perspectives, and readers should keep that in mind, not only in considering how they relate to one another but also how they might relate to all those who didn’t get a say on this occasion.Perhaps the most conspicuous absentees are the current editors. For a variety of reasons, we decided to remain silent or wait for another day. That would be an occasion to describe the major changes that took place since all these former editors left, especially the crisis that the journal went through between issues 200 and 2.01 when it nearly folded. It emerged transformed, as the new production, distribution and financing apparatus that it is today – namely, a freely accessibly online publication, funded through sales of print-on-demand issues and donations, and combined with an archive of issues 1–200 overseen by former editors. This crisis was largely practical, rather than one of ‘ideological direction’, however it was accompanied by a significant change of staff that has had an undoubted impact on the content of the journal since 2016. Whether RP today can still be understood in terms of its founding aims, or perhaps subsequent shifts in those aims, or whether it is now fundamentally different, despite the same name, is a question answered variously by the former editors in this anniversary issue. But, after reading them, it’s a question...