Nathan Lovell proposes that 1 and 2 Kings might be read as a Work of written history, produced with the explicit purpose of shaping the communal identity of its first readers in the Babylonian exile.
By drawing on sociological approaches to the role Historiography plays in the construction of Political identity, Lovell argues the Book of Kings is intended to reconstruct a sense of Israelite identity in the context of these losses, and that the Book of Kings moves beyond providin.
Nathan Lovell proposes that 1 and 2 Kings might be read as a Work of written history, produced with the explicit purpose of shaping the communal identity of its first readers in the Babylonian exile