In recent years, the disciplines of biblical studies and systematic Theology have grown apart and largely lost the means of effective communication with one another.
Torrance Miroslav Volf Rowan Williams.
Tonstad Alan J.
Lincoln Jurgen Moltmann Carl Mosser Stephen Motyer Murray Rae Anastasia Scrutton Marianne Meye Thompson Sigve K.
Stephen Evans Terry Griffith Martin Hengel Kasper Bro Larsen Tord Larsson Judith Lieu Andrew T.
Jeffrey Bingham C.
Barton Richard Bauckham D.
Anderson Stephen C. pointing towards a not-too-distant future when interdisciplinary conversation and collaboration between these two natural partners will become, no longer occasional and surprising, but a normal and essential element in the flourishing of both.- -- Richard Bauckham (from the introduction) Contributors: Paul N. . .
It is a signpost . . . . -This is the beginning of a conversation that can only be enriched by variety and experimentation.
The essays here -- taken from the inaugural conference -- consider this Gospel from many angles, addressing a number of key issues that arise from a theological discussion of this text: John\'s dualism in our pluralist context, historicity and testimony, the treatment of Judaism, Christology, and more.
Due to its profound influence on the development of Christian theology, John\'s Gospel is an ideal base for rekindling fruitful dialogue.
Andrews Conference on Scripture and Theology brought leading biblical scholars and systematic theologians together in conversation, seeking to bridge the gap between them.
The first St.
Unfortunately, this relational disconnect affects more than just these particular fields of study; it impacts the life of the church as a whole.
In recent years, the disciplines of biblical studies and systematic Theology have grown apart and largely lost the means of effective communication with one another
