Descriere YEO:
Pe YEO găsești The Intelligible Constitution de la , în categoria Științe & Cunoaștere > Istorie & Politică.
Indiferent de nevoile tale, The Intelligible Constitution din categoria Științe & Cunoaștere > Istorie & Politică îți poate aduce un echilibru perfect între calitate și preț, cu avantaje practice și moderne.
Preț: 29.99 Lei
- Brand:
- Categoria: Științe & Cunoaștere > Istorie & Politică
- Magazin: anticexlibris.ro
- Ultima actualizare: 25-10-2025 02:12:03
Comandă The Intelligible Constitution Online, Simplu și Rapid
Prin intermediul platformei YEO, poți comanda The Intelligible Constitution de la anticexlibris.ro rapid și în siguranță. Bucură-te de o experiență de cumpărături online optimizată și descoperă cele mai bune oferte actualizate constant.
Descriere magazin:
In Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, a critical abortion rights case, a bitterly divided Supreme Court produced no less than six different opinions. Writing for the plurality, Chief Justice Rehnquist attacked the trimester framework established in Roe v. Wade because it was "not found in the text of the
Constitution or in any place else one would expect to find a constitutional principle." This approach, writes legal authority Joseph Goldstein, confuses constitutional principles (in this case, the right to privacy) with the means to protect them (here, the trimester system). As a result, the Court left the public bewildered about the constitutional scope of a woman\'s right to reproductive choice--failing in its duty to speak clearly to the American public about the
Constitution. In The
Intelligible Constitution, Goldstein makes a compelling argument that, in a democracy based upon informed consent, the Supreme Court has an obligation to communicate clearly and candidly to We the People when it interprets the Constitution. After a fascinating discussion of the language of the Constitution and Supreme Court opinions (including the analysis of Webster), he presents a series of opinion studies in important cases, focusing not on ideology but on the Justices\' clarity of thought and expression. Using the two Brown v. Board of Education cases, Cooper v. Aaron, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, and others as his examples, Goldstein demonstrates the pitfalls to which the Court has succumbed in the past: Writing deliberately ambiguous decisions to win the votes of colleagues, challenging each others\' opinions in private but not in public, and not speaking honestly when the writer knows a concurring Justice misunderstands the opinion which he or she is suppo...