This work examines the historical and philosophical strengths and/or weaknesses of current evangelical approaches espousing some forms of post-modernistic historiography and its resultant search for the historical Jesus.
He specializes in the impact of historical-critical philosophical ideologies in New Testament Criticism and Interpretation..
Three Views on Origins of the Synoptic Gospels, 2002).
He was co-editor of The Jesus Crisis (1998) as well as contributor to other books (e.g.
David Farnell is Senior Professor of New Testament at The Master\'s Seminary.
F.
Geisler was a key founder of the historic International Council on Biblical Inerrancy (1978) as well as the International Council on Biblical Hermeneutics (1982).
Dr.
He is Chancellor of Veritas Evangelical Seminary in Murrieta, California.
Geisler is a world-renown Christian apologist who has written over 80 books.
Swanson, D.
Min., Vice President for Library and Educational Assessment Norman L. candidate, Co-Author of Defending Inerrancy Dennis M.
Roach, Ph.
D.
Nix, Ph.
D., Professor of Historical and Theological Studies, Veritas Evangelical Seminary William C.
Howe, Ph.
D., Professor of Bible and Biblical Languages, Southern Evangelical Seminary William E.
Howe, Ph.
D., Professor of Philosophy and Apologetics, Southern Evangelical Seminary Thomas A.
David Farnell, Ph.
D., Senior Professor of New Testament, The Master\'s Seminary Richard G.
Geisler, Ph.
D., Chancellor, Veritas Evangelical Seminary
Distinguished Professor of Apologetics and Theology F.
CONTRIBUTORS: Norman L.
This book raises serious questions about such an endeavor.
A number of well-known, contemporary evangelical scholars are involved in the so-called Third Quest for the historical Jesus.
It compares the Jesus Seminar\'s approach with current evangelical practices of searching in terms of their evidential apologetic impact on the trustworthiness of the Gospels.
It demonstrates the marked undermining impact these efforts have had on the biblical text, especially the Gospels, as well inerrancy issues.
This work examines the historical and philosophical strengths and/or weaknesses of current evangelical approaches espousing some forms of post-modernistic historiography and its resultant search for the historical Jesus
