The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America - Jeffrey Rosen

Descriere YEO:

The Supreme Court: The Personalities - Disponibil la libris.ro

Pe YEO găsești The Supreme Court: The Personalities de la Jeffrey Rosen, în categoria Law.

Indiferent de nevoile tale, The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America - Jeffrey Rosen din categoria Law îți poate aduce un echilibru perfect între calitate și preț, cu avantaje practice și moderne.

Preț: 104.11 Lei

Caracteristicile produsului The Supreme Court: The Personalities

• Brand: Jeffrey Rosen
• Categoria: Law
• Magazin: libris.ro
• Ultima actualizare: 25-10-2024 01:12:27

Comandă The Supreme Court: The Personalities Online, Simplu și Rapid

Prin intermediul platformei YEO, poți comanda The Supreme Court: The Personalities de la libris.ro rapid și în siguranță. Bucură-te de o experiență de cumpărături online optimizată și descoperă cele mai bune oferte actualizate constant.

Descriere magazin:
Rosen, a leading Supreme Court expert, recounts the personal and philosophical rivalries that forged the nations highest court and continue to shape lives. Superbly well written . . . a wonderfully informative guide to the Supreme Court both past and present.--David J. Garrow, American History Jeffrey Rosen recounts the history of the Supreme Court through the personal and philosophical rivalries that have transformed the law--and by extension, our lives. With studies of four crucial conflicts--Chief Justice John Marshall and President Thomas Jefferson; post-Civil War justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes; liberal icons Hugo Black and William O. Douglas; and conservative stalwarts William H. Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia--Rosen brings vividly to life the perennial rivalry between those justices guided by strong ideology and those who cared more about the court as an institution, forging coalitions and adjusting to new realities. He ends with a revealing conversation with Chief Justice John Roberts, who is attempting to change the court in unexpected ways. The stakes, he shows, are nothing less than the future of American jurisprudence.