By rewriting both canonical and lesser-known Tort cases from a Feminist perspective, this volume exposes gender and racial bias in how courts have categorized and evaluated harm stemming from pre-natal malpractice, pregnancy loss, domestic violence, sexual assault and harassment, invasion of privacy, and the award of economic and non-economic damages.
The Rewritten Opinions demonstrate that when confronted with gendered harm to women, courts have often distorted or misapplied conventional legal.
By rewriting both canonical and lesser-known Tort cases from a Feminist perspective, this volume exposes gender and racial bias in how courts have categorized and evaluated harm stemming from pre-natal malpractice, pregnancy loss, domestic violence, sexual assault and harassment, invasion of privacy, and the award of economic and non-economic damages