Not quite non-fiction, not quite self-help.
The end result feels more like poetry than prose..
Only actionable directives .
No -isms are named.
No philosophers are quoted. 113 incredibly succinct pages of profound insights.
Meant for reflection as much as instruction.
A very unique and thought-provoking book.
It\'s a philosophy of conflicting philosophies .
Which one is right? Which does the author believe? All of them.
The next, to delay gratification and invest for the future.
One chapter persuades you to be fully present, and experience each moment.
The next chapter argues why you should commit to one career, one place, and one person.
One chapter makes a compelling argument for why you should be completely independent, keeping all options open.
And each chapter disagrees with the next .
In How to Live, each chapter believes it knows how you should live.
But each book disagrees with the next.
Many books believe they know how you should live.
It\'s a work of art about conflicting philosophies.
Not quite non-fiction, not quite self-help
